Transcript: Interview with “Economic Hit Man” John Perkins

johnperkinsThe transcript of Dialogos Radio’s interview with “economic hit man” John Perkins follows below. This interview was published in Truthout on September 11, 2014 and is reprinted here.  This interview aired on November 14-15, 2013. Find the podcast of this interview here.

MN: In your book, you write about how you were, for many years, a so-called “economic hit man.” Who are these economic hit men, and what do they do?

JP: Essentially, my job was to identify countries that had resources that our corporations want, and that could be things like oil, or it could be markets, it could be transportation systems, there’s so many different things. Once we identified these countries, we arranged huge loans to them, but the money would never actually go to the countries, instead it would go to our own corporations to build infrastructure projects in those countries, things like power plants and highways that benefitted a few wealthy people as well as our own corporations, but not the majority of people who couldn’t afford to buy into these things, and yet they were left holding a huge debt, very much like what Greece has today, a phenomenal debt. And once bound by that debt, we would go back, usually in the form of the IMF, and in the case of Greece today, it’s the IMF and the EU, and make tremendous demands on the country: increase taxes, cut back on spending, sell public sector utilities to private companies, things like power companies and water systems, transportation systems, privatize those, and basically become a slave to us, to the corporations, to the IMF, in your case to the EU, and basically, organizations like the World Bank, the IMF, the EU, are tools of the big corporations, what I call the “corporatocracy.”

MN: And before turning specifically to the case of Greece, let’s talk a little bit more about the manner in which these economic hit men and these organizations like the IMF operate. You mentioned, of course, how they go in and they work to get these countries into massive debt, that money goes in and then goes straight back out. You also mentioned in your book these overly optimistic growth forecasts that are sold to the politicians of these countries but which really have no semblance with reality.

JP: Exactly, we’d show that if these investments were made in things like electric energy systems, that the economy would grow at phenomenally high rates. The fact of the matter is, when you invest in these big infrastructure projects you do see economic growth, however, most of that growth reflects the wealthy getting wealthier and wealthier, it doesn’t reflect the majority of the people, and we’re seeing that in the United States today, for example, where we can show economic growth, growth in the GDP, but at the same time unemployment may be going up or staying level, and foreclosures on houses may be going up or staying number. These numbers tend to reflect the very wealthy, since they have a huge percentage of the economy, statistically speaking. Nevertheless, we would show that when you invest in these infrastructure projects, your economy does grow, and yet, we would even show it growing much faster than it ever conceivably would, and that was only used to justify these horrendous, incredibly debilitating loans.

MN: Is there a common theme with regards to the countries who are typically targeted? Are they, for instance, rich in resources or do they typically possess some other strategic importance to the powers that be?

JP: Yes, all of those. Resources can take many different forms, one is the material resources like minerals or oil, another resource is strategic location, another resource is a big marketplace or cheap labor. So, different countries make different requirements. I think what we’re seeing in Europe today isn’t any different, and that includes Greece.

MN: What happens once these countries that are targeted are indebted? How do these major powers, these economic hit men, these international organizations come back and get their “pound of flesh,” if you will, from the countries that are heavily in debt.

JP: By insisting that the countries adopt policies that will sell their publicly-owned utility companies, water and sewage systems, maybe schools, transportation systems, even jails, to the big corporations. Privatize, privatize. Allow us to build military bases on their soil, many things that can be done, but basically, they become servants to what I call the corporatocracy. You have to remember that today we have a global empire, and it’s not an American empire, it’s not a national empire, it doesn’t help the American people very much, it’s a corporate empire, and the big corporations rule. They control the politics of the United States, and to a large degree they control a great deal of the policies of countries like China, around the world.

MN: John, looking specifically now at the case of Greece, of course you mentioned your belief that the country has become the victim of economic hit men and these international organizations…what was your reaction when you first heard about the crisis in Greece and the measures that were to be implemented in the country?

JP: I’ve been following Greece for a long time, I was on Greek television, a Greek film company did a documentary called “Apology of an Economic Hit Man,” and I also spent a lot of time in Iceland and in Ireland. I was invited to Iceland to help encourage the people there to vote on a referendum not to repay their debts, and I did that and encouraged them not to, and they did vote no, and as a result, Iceland is doing quite well now economically compared to the rest of Europe. Ireland, on the other hand, I tried to do the same thing there, but the Irish people apparently voted against the referendum, though there’s been many reports that there was a lot of corruption. In the case of Greece, my reaction was that “Greece is being hit,” there’s no question about it. Sure, Greece made mistakes, your leaders made some mistakes, but the people didn’t really make the mistakes, and now the people are being asked to pay for the mistakes made by their leaders, often in cahoots with the big banks. So, people make tremendous amounts of money off of these so-called “mistakes,” and now, the people who didn’t make the mistakes are being asked to pay the price. That’s consistent around the world, we’ve seen it in Latin America, we’ve seen it in Asia, we’ve seen it in so many places around the world.

MN: This leads directly to the next question I had: from my observation at least in Greece, the crisis has been accompanied by an increase in self-blame or self-loathing, there’s this sentiment in Greece that many people have that the country failed, that the people failed…there’s hardly even protest in Greece anymore, and of course there’s a huge “brain drain,” there’s a lot of people that are leaving the country. Does this all seem familiar to you when comparing to other countries in which you’ve had personal experience?

JP: Sure, that’s part of the game: convince people that they’re wrong, that they’re inferior. The corporatocracy is incredibly good at that, whether it is back during the Vietnam War, convincing the world that the North Vietnamese were evil, today it’s the Muslims, it’s a policy of them versus us: we are good, we are right, we do everything right, you’re wrong. And in this case, all of this energy has been directed at the Greek people to say “you’re lazy, you didn’t do the right thing, you didn’t follow the right policies,” when in actuality, an awful lot of the blame needs to be laid on the financial community that encouraged Greece to go down this route. And I would say that we have something very similar going on in the United States, where people here are being led to believe that because their house is being foreclosed that they were stupid, that they bought the wrong houses, they overspent themselves. The fact of the matter is their bankers told them to do this, and around the world, we’ve come to trust bankers–or we used to. In the United States, we never believed that a banker would tell us to buy a $500,000 house if in fact we could really only afford a $300,000 house. We thought it was in the bank’s interest not to foreclose. But that changed a few years ago, and bankers told people who they knew could only afford a $300,000 house to buy a $500,000 house. “Tighten your belt, in a few years that house will be worth a million dollars, you’ll make a lot of money”…in fact, the value of the house went down, the market dropped out, the banks foreclosed on these houses, repackaged them, and sold them again. Double whammy. The people were told “you were stupid, you were greedy, why did you buy such an expensive house?” But in actuality, the bankers told them to do this, and we’ve grown up to believe that we can trust our bankers. Something very similar on a larger scale happened in so many countries around the world, including Greece.

MN: In Greece, the traditional major political parties are, of course, overwhelmingly in favor of the harsh austerity measures that have been imposed, but also we see that the major business and media interests are also overwhelmingly in support. Does this surprise me in the slightest?

JP: No, it doesn’t surprise me and yet it’s ridiculous, because austerity does not work. We’ve proven that time and time again, and perhaps the greatest proof was the opposite, in the United States during the Great Depression, when President Roosevelt initiated all these policies to put people back to work, to pump money into the economy. That’s what works. We know that austerity does not work in these situations. We also have to understand that, in the United States for example, over the past 40 years, the middle class has been on the decline on a real dollar basis, while the economy has been increasing. In fact, that’s pretty much happened around the world. Globally, the middle class has been in decline. Big business needs to recognize–it hasn’t yet but it needs to recognize that that serves nobody’s long-term interest, that the middle class is the market. And if the middle class continues to be in decline, whether it’s in Greece or the United States or globally, ultimately businesses will pay the price, they won’t have customers. Henry Ford once said: “I want to pay all my workers enough money so they can go out and buy Ford cars.” That’s a very good policy. That’s wise. This austerity program moves in the opposite direction and it’s a foolish policy.

MN: In your book, which was written in 2004, you expressed hope that the Euro would serve as a counterweight to American global hegemony, to the hegemony of the U.S. Dollar. Did you ever expect that we would see in the European Union what we are seeing today, with austerity that is not just in Greece but also in Spain, Portugal, Ireland, Italy, and also several other countries as well?

JP: What I didn’t realize during any of this period was how much corporatocracy does not want a United Europe. We need to understand this. They may be happy enough with the Euro, with one currency, they are happy to a certain degree by having it united enough that markets are open, but they do not want standardized rules and regulations. Let’s face it, big corporations, the corporatocracy, take advantage of the fact that some countries in Europe have much more lenient tax laws, some have much more lenient environmental and social laws, and they can pit them against each other. What would it be like for big corporations if they didn’t have their tax havens in places like Malta or other places? I think we need to recognize that what the corporatocracy saw, at first the solid Euro, a European union seemed like a very good thing, but as it moved forward, they could see that what was going to happen was that social and environmental laws and regulations were going to be standardized. They didn’t want that, so to a certain degree what’s been going on in Europe has been because the corporatocracy wants Europe to fail, at least on a certain level.

MN: You wrote about the examples of Ecuador and other countries, which after the collapse of oil prices in the late 80s found themselves with huge debts and this, of course, led to massive austerity measures…sounds all very similar to what we are now seeing in Greece. How did the people of Ecuador and other countries that found themselves in similar situations eventually resist?

JP: Ecuador elected a pretty remarkable president, Rafael Correa, who has a Ph.D. in Economics from a United States university. He understands the system, and he understood that Ecuador took on these debts back when I was an economic hit man and the country was ruled by a military junta that was under the control of the CIA and the U.S. That junta took on these huge debts, put Ecuador in deep dept, the people didn’t agree to that. When Rafael Correa was democratically elected, he immediately said “we’re not paying these debts, the people did not take on these debts, maybe the IMF should pay the debts and maybe the junta, which of course was long gone–moved to Miami or someplace–should pay the debts, maybe John Perkins and the other economic hit men should pay the debts, but the people shouldn’t.” And since then, he’s been renegotiating and bringing the debts way down and saying “we might be willing to pay some of them.” That was a very smart move, it reflected similar things that had been done at different times in places like Brazil and Argentina, and more recently, following that model, Iceland, with great success. I have to say that Correa has had some real setbacks since then…he, like so many presidents, have to be aware that if you stand up too strongly against the system, if the economic hit men are not happy, if they don’t get their way, then the jackals will come in and assassinate you or overthrow you in a coup. There was an attempted coup against him, there was a successful coup in a country not too far away from him, Honduras, because these presidents stood up. We have to realize that these presidents are in very very vulnerable positions, and ultimately we the people have to stand up, because leaders can only do a certain amount. Today, in many places, leaders are not just vulnerable, it doesn’t take a bullet to bring down a leader anymore. A scandal, a sex scandal, a drug scandal can bring down a leader. We saw that happen to Bill Clinton, to Strauss-Kahn of the IMF, we’ve seen it happen a number of times. These leaders are very aware that they are in very vulnerable positions, if they stand up or go against the status quo too strongly, they’re going to be taken out, one way or another. They’re aware of that, and that behooves we the people to really stand up for our own rights.

MN: You mentioned the recent example of Iceland…other than the referendum that was held, what other measures did the country adopt to get out of this spiral of austerity and to return to growth and to a much more positive outlook for the country?

JP: It’s been investing money in programs that put people back to war and it’s also been putting on trial some of the bankers that caused the problems, which has been a big uplift in terms of morale for the people. So Iceland has launched some programs that say “no, we’re not going to go into austerity, we’re not going to pay back these loans, we’re going to put the money into putting people back to work,” and ultimately that’s what drives an economy, people working. If you’ve got high unemployment, like you do in Greece today, extremely high unemployment, the country’s always going to be in trouble. You’ve got to bring down that unemployment, you’ve got to hire people. It’s so important to put people back to work. Your unemployment is about 28%, it’s staggering, and disposable income has dropped 40% and it’s going to continue to drop if you have high unemployment. So, the important thing for an economy is to get the employment up and get disposable income back up, so that people will invest in their country and in goods and services.

MN: In closing, what message would you like to share with the people of Greece, as they continue to experience and to live through the very harsh results of the austerity policies that have been implemented in the country for the past three years?

JP: I want to draw upon Greece’s history. You’re a proud, strong country, a country of warriors. The mythology of the warrior to some degree comes out of Greece, and so does democracy! And to realize that the marketplace is a democracy today, and how we spend our money is casting our ballot. Most political democracies are corrupt, including that of the United States. Democracy is not really working on a governmental basis because the corporations are in charge. But it is working on a market basis. I would encourage the people of Greece to stand up, don’t pay off those debts, have your own referendums, refuse to pay them off, go to the streets and strike. And so, I would encourage the Greek people to continue to do this. Don’t accept this criticism that it’s your fault, you’re to blame, you’ve got to suffer austerity, austerity, austerity. That only works for the rich people, it does not work for the average person or the middle class. Build up that middle class, bring employment back, bring disposable income back to the average citizen of Greece. Fight for that, make it happen, stand up for your rights, respect your history as fighters and leaders in democracy, and show the world!

Please excuse any typos or errors which may exist within this transcript.

Copyright Truthout.org. Reprinted with permission.

print

Comments are closed.